Resolving Resolution
|
Everyone is talking MegaPixels these days and we can credit the Digital Camera manufacturers
with that. When you buy a digital camera, the price is usually related to how many
MegaPixels it can produce. The higher the number, the sharper your images and the
more expensive the camera. More pixels generally means more detail.
Dpi is a the term normally associated with scanning and it means Dots Per Inch.
Dpi is a term that's been carried forward from the early days when scanners could
only capture black and white and black was represented with a dot. Today we really
scan in pixels but the term remains and is now used interchangeably with
PPI or Pixels Per Inch. We've scanned a 4x6" photo and we now have a digital
image that's 1200 x 1800. That means we have a matrix or grid that is 1200 in one
direction and 1800 in the other. Learn more about the terms
you'll encounter when you go digital.
|
|
|
Imagine this is our image. It's only 3 pixels x 3 pixels so its not much of an image,
but it can help exemplify how we compute MegaPixels. This image contains 9 pixels:
3 pixels in height by 3 pixels in width. Now, let's just build from there!
|
|
If this simple 3x3 pixel image contains 9 pixels, our 1200 x 1800 pixel image must
contain 2,160,000 pixels. 1200 x 1800 = 2,160,000 – That's 2.16 million pixels
or 2.16 Mega Pixels!
|
|
|
|
|
Cool!
So how big is my file?
The answer to this is, it depends.... I know, just when you thought you had a handle
on this stuff, somebody had to mix it up. The reason it depends is because of compression,
but more on that later. If we take compression out of the equation, it's simple
to compute file size.
A pixel is made up of the three primary colors of Red,
Green, and Blue or simply
RGB. The computer stores the representation of those colors in bytes. One byte for
each of the three colors.
Therefore, 1 pixel = 3 bytes. If our image is 9 pixels, like in
the example above, it's 9 pixels x 3 bytes big, or 27 bytes. One Megabyte is 1 million
bytes. Our 4 x 6 inch print is 2,160,000 pixels so if we do the math, we find that
the image is (2160000 x 3 bytes) 6,480,000 or simply 6.4 Megabytes (MB) in size.
» back to top
|
|
Give me lots of resolution! More is better, right?
Hold on now. More is not always better. Some firms are marketing 3000 DPI for film
and 600 DPI for prints so they can make claims about "higher quality" but science
doesn't support the marketing rhetoric. 2500 dpi for slides and negatives is usually
sufficient and best for most film. However, if your film is of a low ASA and of
high enough quality, 3200 dpi could be a reasonable option.
At your request, our technicians can test your film at the various DPI levels and
let you see the differences and then decide. 4000 dpi or higher is usually not the
best option for consumer level film and/or older film. Modern electronics exceed
the resolution that's available in most film so by scanning at a higher dpi, you
actually start to see the chemistry of the film as flecks or grain. Film like this
actually looks better when scanned at a lower resolution. If you need to crop or
print large, you can use software like PhotoShop to increase the resolution using
special software techniques to get the desired size with better quality results
and less grain.
Higher end film or some of the more modern consumer level high resolution film exude
resolution and higher DPI scanning can work well on that type of film. Paper photos
are only printed at 150 to 300 dpi so when scanning prints, there is no more than
300 dpi of information to recover. Scanning at a higher resolution gives you more
pixels without any extra information. That means, for instance, if you can see the
face of a watch on someone's arm in the print but can't read the time, scanning
at a higher resolution won't bring the time into view. That only happens in Hollywood.
In fact, there are some downsides to scanning prints at a higher DPI. Prints have
usually been stacked and touched and left in boxes. That handling leaves minute
scratches and fingerprints on the surface which get picked up and magnified by scanning.
The higher the DPI, the more prevalent the defects. We will, occasionally, recommend
scanning tiny photos at 600DPI just so the image dimensions will more closely match
those of the other photos we're scanning.
» back to top
|
|
Ok. I think I've got it. But what about compression?
Here's where it gets tricky. There are two types of compression. The first type
is called lossless because it results in no loss in quality or degradation
to the image.
A TIFF file is an example of a lossless
file format. It manages to make the file size smaller the same way that zipping
works. Let's try to compress our 3x3 image and suppose that all of the pixels in
that image are the same color. We could store that image uncompressed and it will
take up 27 bytes. But since all the colors are the same, we could just store it
in such a way that describes the image as 9 black pixels.
Since the pixel takes up 3 bytes, we need three bytes for that then we need one
more byte to indicate how many of those black pixels we have, 9 in this case. We've
just compressed our 27 byte image down to 4 bytes. Of course, this is over simplified,
but that's the basic concept. We can now uncompress the file when we open it and
get an exact representation of the image with no loss in quality. Pretty clever,
huh?
The other type of compression is called lossy because it results in the loss of
data. It works on the assumption that the human eye can't detect certain details
in an image so it strips those details out. This type of compression is much more
complex and also very configurable.
JPEG is considered a lossy compression
file format but its degree of loss is configurable. You can vary the quality factor
from 0 to 100%. As you lower the quality factor toward 0, your file size gets smaller
and your picture loses more detail. The biggest problem with lossy compression comes
up when you open and then save the file over and over again.
It suffers from 2nd generation degradation as each successive save recompresses
and therefore reduces the detail of an image that already lacked some detail. It's
much like a photocopy of a photocopy of a photocopy. Each successive copy of the
previous copy gets worse.
» back to top
|
|
Does that mean that my JPEG files degrade over time?
No, of course not. That's the beauty of going digital! JPEG files don't degrade
over time. The only time you'll encounter the aforementioned loss of quality is
when the file is recompressed and saved on your hard drive by editing it in an editing
software like Photoshop.
Simply viewing the file does no harm and the original files will always be on the
read-only discs that we send you so you can always go back to the source no matter
what happens to any copies you may make.
» back to top
|
|
How many images can fit on a CD or DVD?
Below, we have created a few charts to help you get an idea of how many images can
fit on a CD or DVD and how big your files will be at the different resolutions we
offer. We have also included the differences in size between TIFFs and JPEGs as well as how many Megapixels
(MP) each resolution produces.
Print Sizes vs. Resolution
|
Print Size
|
DPI
|
Pixels
|
MP
|
TIFF
|
JPG
|
|
3x5
|
300
|
900x1500
|
1.3
|
4 MB
|
~1 MB
|
|
600
|
1800x3000
|
5.4
|
16.2 MB
|
~3.2 MB
|
|
4x6
|
300
|
1200x1800
|
2.1
|
6.3 MB
|
~1.3 MB
|
|
600
|
2400x3600
|
8.64
|
26 MB
|
~5 MB
|
|
5x7
|
300
|
1500x2100
|
3.15
|
9.45 MB
|
~2 MB
|
|
600
|
3000x4200
|
12.6
|
37.8 MB
|
~7.6 MB
|
|
Slides & Negatives vs. Resolution
|
DPI
|
Pixels
|
MP
|
TIFF
|
JPG
|
|
2500
|
3250x2250
|
7.3
|
21.9 MB
|
~5.5 MB
|
|
3200
|
4160x2880
|
12.0
|
39.5 MB
|
~9 MB
|
|
4000
|
5200x3600
|
18.7
|
56.1 MB
|
~14 MB
|
Based on 35mm Film being approximately 1.3"x0.9"
|
|
Please Note: The JPEG file sizes are approximate and will vary
depending on the image content. Some images compress in JPEG better than others.
Now you're probably wondering how many images fit on a disc. That's easy to figure
out, too. A CD can hold 650MB while a DVD can hold 4700 MB (4.7 GB).
|
Amount of Prints that would fit on a CD or DVD
Print
Size
|
@ 300 dpi
|
@ 600 dpi
|
|
CD
|
DVD
|
CD
|
DVD
|
|
TIFF
|
JPEG
|
TIFF
|
JPEG
|
TIFF
|
JPEG
|
TIFF
|
JPEG
|
|
3x5
|
162
|
650
|
1175
|
4700
|
39
|
185
|
284
|
1342
|
|
4x6
|
100
|
430
|
746
|
3100
|
25
|
130
|
180
|
940
|
|
5x7
|
68
|
325
|
490
|
2350
|
17
|
81
|
123
|
587
|
These numbers are estimates. Actual results may vary.
|
Amount of Slides that would fit on a CD or DVD
|
DPI
|
CD
|
DVD
|
|
TIFF
|
JPEG
|
TIFF
|
JPEG
|
|
2500
|
30
|
118
|
213
|
885
|
|
3200
|
16
|
72
|
130
|
552
|
|
4000
|
11
|
46
|
83
|
335
|
These numbers are estimates. Actual results may vary.
» back to top
|
|
Would you like to know more about going digital?
Visit our Scanning 101 page for a primer on common
terms you'll encounter!
|
Nationally Acclaimed...
And Locally Loved.
Picture This!
All of your photos - slides, prints, and negatives- in a
single, easy to use digital format, then printed and indexed in our
professionally bound books!
You'll also enjoy DigMyPics exclusives:
Questions About Scanning Your
Old Photos or Movies?
Call us at 1-866-364-5952 or email
sales@digmypics.com
|